I had to manually configure a bunch of runners, and implement good governance to meet compliance mandates and. So at the time when I looked at GitLab runners and the limitations, my thought was "how on earth does it do all of that?". Jenkins is just horrible here with all its plugins, some not even well maintained. Maintenance can impact how easy you keep systems up to date.
Bitnami phabricator defaults to west code#
Sharing code isn't always beneficial once the world starts changing.
![bitnami phabricator defaults to west bitnami phabricator defaults to west](https://zoae.jungheinrich-polska.pl/templates/64af9ff6ec07d70d68e9adf4e68843a5/img/c31d4c43a0a6da4359ff3cc8317c90c0.jpg)
Trying to maintain thousands of configurations both in CI/CD and agents (be it containers, virtual machines or physical machines) is a bit of pain, especially when there are critical patches resulting in breaking changes.Ĭhange is expensive, bot in monetary and opportunity cost.Ĭonfiguration as code has its limitations within each product. Depending on the ecosystem of the agent, anything the agent can connect to is fair game to be compromised. For example, third party malicious code running as part of your tests can steal keys to the kingdom, including stealing your git SSH keys, anything in environments variables, and so forth. You quickly learn than misconfigured CI/CD infrastructure can be used to attack your corporate assets. For example, no one can self promote code to production you need to know the what, who, where, why, when for every piece of code making it to production. Governance Depending on the industry you're in, you may find you need governance, traceability, and consensus for releases.
![bitnami phabricator defaults to west bitnami phabricator defaults to west](https://www.prowebtips.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/search-post-max-size-768x555.png)
Change it to by dynamic (aka the CI/CD tool will manage agents in AWS/Azure/VMware/GCP as needed), could reduce that to around 5K to 15K. One that comes to mind had ~2500 build configurations in TeamCity and hundreds of projects for one product line in healthcare.Īt some point, you'll reach a scale where the following is overbearing:Ĭost Running 50 static agents can cost tens of thousands of dollars per month. I have been building, running, and maintaining rather large CI/CD configurations. I did the same with Jenkins due to poor security.įor that, you have to understand where I came from. So my first impression of GitLab Runners was that it was crap. Once you have terabytes of source code, switching is cost-prohibitive, which is why the time you entered the market matters. The choice of SCM depends heavily of relationships, preferences, and cost. You can use Jenkins and such with GitLab.Īs for version control - it was ok not much different than GitHub, GitHub Enterprise, BitBucket, and such. When you're comparing it to Jenkins, you're comparing GitLab runners to Jenkins (TeamCity, Atlassian Bamboo, and so forth). Treat it with the same respect as your customer facing applications, since you'll have a pretty bad day if it goes down. Be comfortable rebuilding the entire thing from scratch. Implement audit trails (no shared users!) Be comfortable with regular upgrades, like once a week. Whatever platform you go with, I recommend a hard limit of all pipelines/jobs come from SCM. Best practices are often ignored, or not even understood in the first place. Most places, I see the CI solution fall under either the single, overworked ops person, or halfway cared for by one of the most junior engineer. CI/CD as a topic is often treated like an afterthought in most shops as it is. This, unfortunately, leads to the CI solution to become a pet, and incredibly painful to manage declaratively.
![bitnami phabricator defaults to west bitnami phabricator defaults to west](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AxX-BMh9_sw/XTC7Q-esv-I/AAAAAAAAFy4/t8b0k7b8yAIXS45aENTueaonkuRFE7EEQCLcBGAs/s1600/zz03.jpg)
With both platforms, the UI makes it relatively easy to create simple workflow patterns. You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.The major points between the two platforms have been well addressed, so I ramble on a topic I haven't seen brought up.
![bitnami phabricator defaults to west bitnami phabricator defaults to west](https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/imageserve/5e6b6a2d7d6f2600068f5b8c/960x0.jpg)
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License") If you have an issue related to one of our containers, please go to its specific repository in our GitHub organization and report an issue there. If you have an issue related to one of our charts, please go to the repository and report an issue there. You can have important information about a Cloud provider: There is an updated documentation at where you can find tutorials and FAQs. If the documentation didn't help you, we strongly suggest you to check the resolved issues and the on going ones before addressing an issue.
Bitnami phabricator defaults to west how to#
Popular applications, provided by Bitnami, ready to launch on:īefore continuing, please review our useful guides about how to configure and use your application in our documentation